The use of reintroduction techniques to restore extirpated native species is a fantastic conservation tool. In my mind, that we have to resort to reintroductions is a consequence of past failures to look after our biodiversity, but we live and we learn. The UK is one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world and the populations of far too many species continue to decline. There should be room for plenty of hope as we know how to ‘do’ conservation. Populations can be restored:
- Red Kites, once hanging on in Wales are now a common site across many parts of the UK (partly through targeted reintroductions and partly through better protection)
- Bitterns are now booming, mainly due to habitat recreation, restoration and appropriate management. And what is good for Bitterns is good for other inhabitants of reed beds.
- Big policy measures such as those aimed at reducing river pollution have benefited species such as Otters – now increasing after population declines. Mute Swans have responded positively since a national ban on the use of lead in fishing weights
- Eradicating invasive species have had local benefits on seabird breeding populations.
For many species that have been extirpated then reintroduction offers the best way to get them back (if that’s what we want), and the UK has a good track record of conservation success using this approach, although success is certainly not guaranteed. There appears to have been a lot interest in various reintroduction initiatives in recent weeks, and on my social media feeds I’ve noticed the following:
- A Pine Marten reintroduction to the Forest of Dean is showing early signs of success with successful breeding recently confirmed. The idea seems to be to try and link them up with a reintroduced population in Wales that is also doing well.
- A Hen Harrier reintroduction to the south of England continues to be developed despite the main threat being illegal killing in the ‘strongholds’ of the uplands.
- Localised Beaver reintroductions are popping up all over the place – the coverage of the Cornwall project was one of the best parts of this year’s Springwatch (here and here).
- White Storks have bred on the Knepp Estate for the first time in the UK for more 600 hundred years (although whether they were historically regular breeders seems to be a bone of contention).
- European Bison are going to be reintroduced to Kent after a gap of several thousand years.
- The foundations are being laid for future eagle reintroductions in Wales.
Of course there are plenty of other reintroduction projects underway too. The purpose of this short blog is not to critique any of the above projects individually, although I have to say that the Pine Marten reintroduction is for me the stand out project. Maybe it’s just me, but all of these projects just seem a little bit too random. Is there some sort of grand reintroduction strategy or plan for the UK out there? Have we lost the meaning of what a species reintroduction actually is – is putting a few individual Bison in an enclosure a reintroduction or the utilisation of a species to perform a particular ecological role? Isn’t the key ecological function that is missing from the UK a predator of herbivores? If sufficient resources were targeted at the key cause of local extinction of a given species would we need to plan costly reintroductions – a million quid and Government time spent on updating legislation to tackle illegal killing would be resources well allocated. Removing Beaver enclosures and allowing populations to naturally spread must surely be the next step, with the caveat that some individuals may have to be trapped and translocated if they set up in the ‘wrong’ place. What species will be next and why? Should we just finish the job for a few select species before moving on to the next? The Red Kite reintroduction was a success because the approach was to do a series of local reintroductions to maximise the national population spread (it has largely worked except where illegal killing remains a problem). Should ‘we’ spend the next 5 years replicating Pine Marten reintroductions across England and Wales – maybe that is the plan? Why are there so few species reintroductions being driven by National Parks?
This blog offers a few random thoughts on what from the outside appears to be an increasingly ad hoc programme of species reintroductions in the UK – maybe I’m just out of touch with what is going on in the upper echelons of the conservation world. I’m sure that JNCC, the Statutory Conservation Agencies and the conservation organisations have a UK reintroduction strategy – don’t they?
Photo credit: Bison via Kent BBC website; Pine Marten via the Guardian; White Stork via Knepp website; Beaver by Steve Haywood/National Trust via BBC Springwatch website
(18)Dislikes
(0)
The rhetoric around bison is playing to the gallery of fashionable safari park rewilding, but fundamentally it is no different than conservation grazing - using domestic livestock as a tool for species gardening. Nature conservation in Britain is predicated on such action because it seeks to maintain species associated with agricultural landscapes. That bison are not a domesticated animal should ring warning bells about this rhetoric - fencing these animals merely creates an open-air zoo that cuts across the animals life history, its habitat selection, movement ecology and home range. Its not a reintroduction when it is behind a fence, in the same way that so many beaver trapped from the wild and then enslaved behind fences in England to be used as tools in safari park rewilding are also not a reintroduction. They too are not a domesticated species, and thus are also denied their life history.
There is no contention about beaver being a former native species and thus demanding of reinstatement. I see no evidence that European bison are a former native species here, and thus any rhetoric about reintroduction is also false when seeking to set them free would be a translocation OUTSIDE of their natural range. Introducing "animals which are not ordinarily resident in and are not regular visitors to Great Britain in a wild state" (s14 Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) would require a licence application to Natural England (s16 Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981). The rhetoric says that they would be a substitution for the extinct aurochs, allegedly as a conservation translocation, an Ecological Replacement, but to be considered for that latter, there would have to be a close equivalence in ecological function. However, dietary isotope studies show that bison and aurochs differed in their diet and habitat selection.
You are right that there is no grand reintroduction strategy or plan for the UK, but there should be. The piecemeal approach to reinstatement of pine marten is a symptom of that. All the statutory agencies want to do is regulate reintroduction rather than deliver it. Without planning at a national level, there is little hope that the key ecological function that is missing from the UK, of a large predator of herbivores, will ever be reinstated..